#BWNFridayPost: Mitigating white Western individualistic bias and creating more inclusive neuroscience

Link to the paper

This paper by Linzie Taylor and Karen S. Rommelfanger discusses how currently, neuroscience is not meeting its full potential–and how this can be improved. They argue that this is due to white Western individualist bias (WWIB), which leads to the ignorance of many factors in neuroscience research that would otherwise promote equality. One such example from the paper, among many given, is EEG scans, and how despite the fact that they have much more noise when used on scalps of people with coarse and curly hair (i.e. in populations of African descent), neuroscience has continued heavily depending on using EEG globally for about 100 years. After illustrating this problem, the authors develop a framework for a more “relational” approach to science–an approach that, if adopted by neuroscientists, will hopefully increase the inclusivity of research as a whole.

Technologies for Neuroengineering 2022

conference link
October 25-27, 2022

Organisers: Michelle Korda, Steven Lukman, Chiara Pastore, Iris Liu

Total talks gender ratio: 13 Women: 11 Men (54%)
Estimated base rate of women in the field: 43%*
BWN rating: 4, within or at 2 standard deviations above base rate

**Method of estimation: previously established base rate of women in the neuroscience field

#BWNFridayPost: Quantifying hierarchy and dynamics in US faculty hiring and retention

Link to the paper

Here is a link to a twitter thread by one of the authors

This paper by K. Hunter Wapman, Sam Zhang, Aaron Clauset, & Daniel B. Larremore evaluates the dynamics of various aspects of academia hiring in the US, and the extreme inequalities of this process. In a section of this study, they also find that while there are gains for women’s representation in academia in most subjects, these improvements are mostly a result of demographic turnover and earlier hiring changes. Thus, they suggest, that without further changes long-term gender parity in most fields will likely not be achieved.

They also have numerous other findings, such as that a small set of universities produce most of the US-hired professors, and that there is a higher attrition rate among non-US trained faculty.

#BWNFridayPost – Alba Network: Towards Diversity and Equity in Brain Sciences

Photo by DS stories on Pexels.com

This week’s BWN Friday Post brings you the Alba Network, a team and network dedicated to promoting diversity and equity in the brain sciences. They have so many amazing resources and so much information on their website, but we especially wanted to highlight their resources section (particularly their guide for organizing a diverse conference), as well their many working groups! Check out the website, share their resources, and get involved here!

Bernstein Conference 2022

Conference link
September 13-16, 2022

Organisers:
Raoul-Martin Memmesheimer, Christian Machens, Tatjana Tchumachenko, Moritz Helias, Anna Levina, Megan Carey, Brent Doiron, Tatiana Engel, Ann Hermundstad, Christian Leibold, Timothy O’Leary, Srdjan Ostojic, Cristina Savin, Mark van Rossum, Friedemann Zenke

Total speakers/talks gender ratio: 8 Women: 12 Men (40%)
Estimated base rate of women in the field: 26%*
BWN rating: 4, within or at 2 standard deviation above base rate

*Method of estimation: previously established base rate of women in the computational neuroscience field

#BWNFridayPost – Expanding DEI to Disability: Opportunities for Biological Psychiatry

Photo by Karolina Grabowska on Pexels.com

This week’s BWN Friday Post brings you a paper by Perry Zurn, Joseph Stramondo, Joel Reynolds, and Dani Bassett. In it, they discuss the importance of expanding DEI efforts within the field of biological psychiatry to include disability justice, what has been done so far, and concrete recommendations to continue working upon this going forward.

Read the full paper here.